Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '19 at 18:57
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 562
72% 546 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 243
Parallax 252
186% 241 fps
MRender 266
Gravity 222
Splatting 138
163% 209 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 163%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 822 648 647 646 644 643 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1461
Write 1,229
Mixed 639
SusWrite 675
223% 1,001 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 66.4
242% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,104
DQ Write 1,304
DQ Mixed 969
795% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 228%
Great: 254%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
931GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2437 2245 1565 1568 1569 1570 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
392% Outstanding
Read 2,624
Write 2,225
Mixed 1,962
SusWrite 1,826
484% 2,159 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 95.8
320% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,881
DQ Write 1,568
DQ Mixed 1644
1,253% 1,698 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 392%
Great: 410%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
98GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 426 397 358 322 266 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 470
Mixed 328
SusWrite 363
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 46
173% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 181
156% 223 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
512GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 109 112 113 114 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 106
Write 101
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 112
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
572GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 96 102 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 102
Write 89
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 100
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$408
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 25.7
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 25.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback