Asus P5N-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5N-D  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '19 at 16:12
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 45.3
1-Core 27.1
2-Core 45.2
26% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 98.6
8-Core 127
14% 113 Pts
64-Core 135
8% 135 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Asus(1043 835C) 768MB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 920 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 13.3
12% 15.1 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 14.8
13% 16.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCS 256GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 81 87 92 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 109
Write 92.6
Mixed 106
SusWrite 87.8
22% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 19.8
63% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 56.2
DQ Mixed 32.2
26% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 43%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
410GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 107 108 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 107
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 64%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
253GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 91 92 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 89.8
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 90.2
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 58%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 89 91 94 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 83.3
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 87.9
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 3.5
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5N-D Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $490
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $157Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback