HP Spectre 13 x2 PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP Spectre 13 x2 PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2152
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131226
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateMay 04 '19 at 10:51
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4202Y
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 93.1
43% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 133
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz)
HP(103C 2152) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3277
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 4.91
3% 4.52 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 5.87
4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE128HMGR-000H1 128GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT43H0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 307
Write 48.4
Mixed 65.7
30% 140 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 9.1
53% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 36
DQ Mixed 40
64% 130 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4B8G1646Q-MYK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 17.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Spectre 13 x2 PC Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Spectre 13 x2 PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback