Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 70.5 2-Core 126 53% 88 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 183 24% 183 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.4 Reflection 15.1 Parallax 18.5 16% 17.7 fps	MRender 16.4 Gravity 18.7 Splatting 20.2 15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 62 66 71 69 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 50.9 Write 69.1 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 65.4 42% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905458-009.A00LF 3x2GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 11.8 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 7.7 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	5x

SSD
MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 49%, 3,311 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	4x
9905403-173.A00LF 4x2GBKingstonBench 46%, 212 samples	2x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	2x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $379