Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Memory 46.7 1-Core 44.7 2-Core 89.6 36% 60.3 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 179 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2067) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.64% Terrible	Lighting 2.53 Reflection 2.77 Parallax 2.22 2% 2.51 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 6.43 4% 4.36 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.64% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 392 415 396 400 212 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Read 447 Write 396 Mixed 404 SusWrite 364 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 38.9 124% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 261 199% 268 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde RMT3170EB68F9W1600 2x4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.1% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 10.6 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	127x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	124x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	3x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	8x

RAM
99U5469-045.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 43%, 788 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	6x
99U5469-045.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 22%, 1,714 samples	5x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16