Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990XA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130204
Uptime17.6 Days
Run DateMay 03 '19 at 11:13
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 123
55% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 204
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2872) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 26.1
17% 22.1 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 21.4
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 36 34 35 36 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 295
Write 55
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 36.2
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 16.2
74% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 46.8
DQ Mixed 44.1
54% 101 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 73%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
14GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 84 95 89 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 70.8
Write 68.7
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 91.6
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 74%
ST2000DL 001-9VT156 2TB
30GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 29.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 16
32% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 16%
WD Elements 2TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 27.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 15.9
33% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA1339 CT25664BA1339 Kingston 9905402-477.A 8GB
667, 667, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.7% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.1
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990XA-UD3 Builds (Compare 563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback