Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 12,140 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 49.3 1-Core 56.5 2-Core 113 42% 72.8 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 216 29% 218 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 44%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 267GB free (System drive) Firmware: JU001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 36 50 62 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 27 Write 44 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 50.1 24% 33.1 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0 15% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 79%
SDXC Card 64GB 1,393 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 59GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 29 30 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 36.7 Write 30.3 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 29.8 43% 32.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 3.1 204% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB 42,779 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.1% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 10.2 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 163 24% 163 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	2,168x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,686x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	297x

SSD
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	130x
Optane+932GBHDD 1TBIntelBench 59%, 6,924 samples	121x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	101x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	639x
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 36%, 7,851 samples	374x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	360x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16