Dell Precision 5820 Tower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision 5820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0TVW7J
Memory17.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180726
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 02 '19 at 09:05
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2104
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 376
45% 345 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Dell(1028 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70% Good
Lighting 84.3
Reflection 95
Parallax 87.2
69% 88.8 fps
MRender 89.9
Gravity 82.5
Splatting 91.8
72% 88.1 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago MR9440-8i 600GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 228 228 228 228 225 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 222
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 228
134% 185 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.5
294% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 125%
Great: 138%
Avago MR9440-8i 600GB
345GB free
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 224 221 220 220 219 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 211
Write 213
Mixed 120
SusWrite 221
140% 191 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.4
320% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 124%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7AFR8N-VK 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 53.2
MC Mixed 26.4
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 8.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 5820 Tower Builds (Compare 2,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

System: Dell Precision 5820 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback