Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 30 '19 at 18:34
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 135
58% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 464
42% 353 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61% Good
Lighting 76.7
Reflection 81.8
Parallax 72.2
62% 76.9 fps
MRender 78.6
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 64.8
58% 71.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3225
Write 2,645
Mixed 2,726
638% 2,865 MB/s
4K Read 260
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 221
784% 227 MB/s
DQ Read 594
DQ Write 452
DQ Mixed 539
399% 528 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate ST9120821AS 120GB
16GB free
Firmware: 3.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 29.3
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 24.4
19% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 23%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
258GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 81.5
Write 80.8
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 72.3
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 69%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
948GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 86 84 86 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48% Average
Read 81
Write 79.5
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 85.9
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback