| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Boot Drive | 82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190410 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 30 '19 at 17:08 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | JOR-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
97.8%
Outstanding
|
94% 169 Pts
|
90% 736 Pts
|
70% 1,123 Pts
|
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 140 132 134 132 220 MB/s
|
82.5%
Excellent
|
54% 244 MB/s
|
148% 54 MB/s
|
161% 243 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
870GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 146 146 146 146 MB/s
|
84%
Excellent
|
96% 130 MB/s
|
210% 1.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
76%
Very good
|
76% 26.4 GB/s
|
69% 24.1 GB/s
|
66% 61 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,791 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 449x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 252x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 227x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 147x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 136x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 106x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $476 |