Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory15GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD5  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 15 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 28 '19 at 12:44
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 117
59% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 340
35% 285 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Gigabyte(1458 34A1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 5.83
Reflection 8.62
Parallax 1.94
5% 5.46 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 4.03
Splatting 6.04
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 75 77 78 84 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.4% Above average
Read 232
Write 226
Mixed 194
SusWrite 78.8
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 33.6
111% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 41.2
37% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
468GB free
Firmware: CCH1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 59 64 64 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 119
Write 120
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 62.4
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52%
Great: 70%
WD WD10TPVT-00H 1TB
236GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 53
Write 25.5
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 71.4
34% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 49%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
310GB free
Firmware: 100.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 59 64 64 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 120
Write 92.5
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 62.3
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 71%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
26GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 92 95 96 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 70
SusWrite 93.3
68% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.3
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 69%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID 2528
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.4 7.1 7 7.1 7.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Read 23.8
Write 7.5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 6.9
13% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 7%
Mass Storage Device 64GB
59GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 21.3
Write 14.8
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 16.8
24% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.1
78% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 19%
Seagate BUP Fast HDD 4TB
657GB free, PID ab2a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 85 87 89 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 106
Write 80.5
Mixed 79
SusWrite 86.9
117% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.7
244% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 15GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback