Acer Predator G6-710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator G6-710  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G6-710
Memory40.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 28 '19 at 11:24
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 255
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 700
74% 593 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.9% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 108
Parallax 89.3
78% 97.9 fps
MRender 93.1
Gravity 91.6
Splatting 95.2
77% 93.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 640 323 325 323 325 323 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,432
Write 1,458
Mixed 858
SusWrite 376
282% 1,281 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 82
278% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 845
DQ Mixed 923
689% 917 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 247%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 EVO 250GB
201GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,526
Write 5,376
Mixed 5,562
1,296% 5,822 MB/s
4K Read 557
4K Write 239
4K Mixed 304
1,360% 367 MB/s
DQ Read 1,298
DQ Write 919
DQ Mixed 1,023
787% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 129%
Ngff to USB3.0 1153E 256GB
175GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 146 68 136 136 53 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 350
Write 174
Mixed 112
SusWrite 106
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 16.8
60% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 59.3
DQ Mixed 130
86% 104 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
285GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 142 145 144 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 115
Write 119
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 143
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
45GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 109 109 111 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 65
SusWrite 109
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 109%
WD My Book 25EE 3TB
91GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
41% Average
Read 75.8
Write 55.2
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 107
104% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV16GX4M1A2400C16 0215 CMV16GX4M1A2400C16 0215 CMV8GX4M1A2400C16 0215 CMV8GX4M1A2400C16 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.2% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 20.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G6-710 Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: Acer Predator G6-710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback