Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '19 at 20:10
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 150
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 431
42% 346 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 115
Parallax 106
88% 109 fps
MRender 98.2
Gravity 102
Splatting 105
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 197 179 158 147 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 336
Write 316
Mixed 262
SusWrite 172
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 35
121% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 135
118% 175 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 97%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
13GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 98 118 120 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 154
Write 144
Mixed 146
SusWrite 114
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 30.4
115% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 136
106% 145 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55%
Great: 61%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
436GB free
Firmware: 04.01G01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 53 52 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 66
Write 61.8
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 51.6
41% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 63%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
63GB free
Firmware: GM4OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 77 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 53
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 76.7
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 51%
Seagate ST3200826AS 200GB
19GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 50 51 50 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 51
Write 13.8
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 50.4
28% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 37%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
26GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 61 64 56 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 65
Write 41
Mixed 49
SusWrite 60
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 58%
WL5000GSA12872B 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 00.0DUP1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 93 90 91 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 83
Write 128
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 92.1
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
262% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 CMX8GX3M1A1600C11 CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback