Asus P5G41T-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5G41T-M  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '19 at 13:40
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$131
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 36.1
2-Core 72.1
42% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 138
19% 139 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Gigabyte(1458 2553) 2GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 38.1
22% 32.2 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 37
25% 29.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721075KLA330 750GB-$38
640GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GK8OAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 58 55 60 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 78.4
Write 81.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 58.7
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 47%
Hitachi HDS721075KLA330 750GB-$38
690GB free
Firmware: GK8OAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 62 59 63 69 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 79.9
Write 81.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 61.3
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5G41T-M Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41T-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback