ADD TO PC
BUILD

Razer Blade Pro

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Blade Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Blade Pro
Memory	23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161107
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '19 at 21:38
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 93.1 2-Core 164 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 518 51% 418 Pts	64-Core 520 32% 520 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2780 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 175 Parallax 189 102% 163 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 171 Splatting 124 112% 137 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 133%
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile) 17,197 User benchmarks, average bench 95% Device(1A58 6750) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2507 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.7% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 129 Parallax 121 92% 121 fps	MRender 98 Gravity 103 Splatting 102 83% 101 fps
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 17,176 User benchmarks, average bench 242% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 854 492 471 460 389 439 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 2,648 Write 1,470 Mixed 1,007 SusWrite 518 311% 1,411 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 54.9 184% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 722 DQ Write 615 DQ Mixed 662 498% 666 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 372%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 176GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 283 297 304 251 305 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 383 Write 347 Mixed 334 SusWrite 282 76% 336 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 27.6 88% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 167 123% 161 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 99%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 26GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 283 295 303 249 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 377 Write 343 Mixed 328 SusWrite 281 75% 332 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 27.8 90% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 158 116% 150 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 99%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 149 151 138 150 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 116 Write 78 Mixed 38 SusWrite 150 69% 95.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 0.7 251% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB 4,393 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 23.1 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 20.1 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Blade Pro Builds (Compare 295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Razer Blade Pro

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	125x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	94x
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples	122x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	62x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	59x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	35x
Raid 0 Volume 1TBIntelBench 242%, 17,176 samples	32x
MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 121%, 3,154 samples	24x

RAM
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6B1 2x16GBMicronBench 86%, 409 samples	82x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 23,910 samples	61x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback