Acer Aspire M7811

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire M7811  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M7811
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '19 at 13:53
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 168
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 367
43% 331 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.87
Reflection 6.38
Parallax 1.91
4% 4.39 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 4.39
4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63
485GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 38 41 51 81 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 79.7
Write 83.6
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 55.2
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
293GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 89.5
Mixed 62
SusWrite 105
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 67%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
37GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 20.8
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 18.3
28% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 22%
SAMSUNG HD503HI 500GB
137GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 21.4
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 18.7
30% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.7
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M7811 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M7811

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $407
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback