Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateApr 24 '19 at 23:25
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 273
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 921
84% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,416
88% 1,416 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Zotac(19DA 3500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 159
Parallax 157
134% 160 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 146
Splatting 107
113% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
679GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1369 1089 1094 1099 712 564 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,448
Write 2,217
Mixed 1,570
SusWrite 988
404% 1,806 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 83.6
293% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,343
DQ Write 1120
DQ Mixed 1,217
916% 1,227 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 304%
Great: 431%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 957GB
882GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 231 255 180 128 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 494
Mixed 374
SusWrite 215
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 42.6
160% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 196
186% 292 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 105%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
237GB free
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 911 911 910 911 910 911 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,082
Write 911
Mixed 728
SusWrite 911
256% 1,158 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 60.7
246% 94.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,096
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 372
362% 597 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 245%
Great: 243%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
490GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 83 84 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 82
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 26.7
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 10.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback