ECS H61H2-CM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardECS H61H2-CM  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111021
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 23 '19 at 19:06
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 91.8
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 108
62% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 109
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 59 59 59 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 58.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 56.2
40% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33%
Great: 59%
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
53GB free
Firmware: 3A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 83 82 80 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 88.2
Write 84
Mixed 56
SusWrite 80.7
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 52%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 8GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.4 4.5 4.1 4.4 4.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Read 32.5
Write 9
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 4.4
16% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-033.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.7% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-CM Builds (Compare 252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback