HP ENVY x2 Detachable 12-e0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP ENVY x2 Detachable 12-e0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84C7
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '19 at 14:52
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon(TM) 835
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 46.5
1-Core 20.3
2-Core 41.2
25% 36 Pts
4-Core 77.8
8-Core 101
11% 89.6 Pts
64-Core 97
6% 97 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Skhynix H28U88301AMR 122GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 166 167 167 162 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 315
Write 164
Mixed 199
SusWrite 160
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 20.3
66% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 142
105% 137 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback