Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 21 '19 at 07:53
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 72
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 111
53% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 112
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84B5) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 16
Parallax 17.1
16% 17.6 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 16.8
16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01b10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 315 331 332 331 332 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 358
Write 320
Mixed 304
SusWrite 313
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 30.8
110% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 169
130% 173 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 99%
Fujitsu MHY2120BH 120GB-$46
25GB free
Firmware: 890B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 32 32 31 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 41.9
Write 40.6
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 31.3
26% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 28%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-00ZAT0 500GB
6GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 18 17 17 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 16
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 16.6
26% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.5% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback