Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180920
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 15:38
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 310
102% 186 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 1,025
97% 804 Pts
64-Core 1,264
78% 1,264 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 140
Parallax 117
101% 127 fps
MRender 98.1
Gravity 126
Splatting 107
90% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 858 521 535 534 535 535 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2400
Write 1,479
Mixed 290
SusWrite 586
261% 1,189 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 63.7
213% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 1349
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 1,121
863% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 252%
Great: 293%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
466GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 479 483 484 424 292 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 460
Mixed 435
SusWrite 440
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 59.6
205% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
441GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 461 465 467 396 402 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 413
Mixed 424
SusWrite 442
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 57.7
189% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 292
238% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
465GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2122 897 817 815 816 816 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,333
Write 2,003
Mixed 1,597
SusWrite 1,047
390% 1,745 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 89.5
298% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,707
DQ Write 1,460
DQ Mixed 1,540
1,166% 1,569 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 320%
Great: 355%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 96 97 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 90.7
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 95.3
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 31.6
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 33
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,097
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback