Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GE
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 08:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 190
79% 133 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 381
42% 329 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 18FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.47
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 6.5
4% 14.3 fps
MRender 7.43
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 11.7
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 83 86 66 63 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 414
Write 254
Mixed 289
SusWrite 109
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 16.5
63% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 82.4
DQ Mixed 42.5
47% 79.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 52%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
915GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 112 124 128 126 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 117
Write 125
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 123
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 11.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE Builds (Compare 1,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback