MSI H110M-A PRO M2 (MS-7A82)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A82
MotherboardMSI H110M-A PRO M2 (MS-7A82)  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '19 at 07:13
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 454
60% 447 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.5% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 37.8
35% 41 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 33.9
30% 37 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
358GB free
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 293 381 395 390 393 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 462
Mixed 380
SusWrite 374
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 99.7
4K Mixed 41.1
152% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 197
186% 290 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 104%
Great: 94%
Corsair Force MP300 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$75
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM11.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 97 95 93 90 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 450
Write 272
Mixed 332
SusWrite 111
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 31.7
138% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 143
116% 167 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 128%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 148 147 148 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 150
Write 134
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 146
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 86%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
28GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 6.7 3.6 9.5 4 7.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 148
Write 35.5
Mixed 50
SusWrite 11.3
63% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
79% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH3 859B CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A PRO M2 (MS-7A82) Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M-A PRO M2 (MS-7A82)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 126% - Outstanding Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback