Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '19 at 03:23
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 97.4
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 167
72% 118 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 288
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.7% Average
Lighting 57.6
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 75.8
47% 66.6 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 55
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 65 91 146 131 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.5% Below average
Read 190
Write 192
Mixed 152
SusWrite 111
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 16.6
58% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 50
DQ Write 41.6
DQ Mixed 11.8
18% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 57%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 164 166 163 166 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 216
Mixed 73
SusWrite 165
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 1.1
282% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 136%
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
65GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 99 98 94 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 83.2
Write 84.5
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 98.1
108% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 45%
Seagate GoFlex Desk 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 50a5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 96 120 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 27.2
Write 98.7
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 117
110% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
12GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.5 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 9
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 9
13% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.1
142% 3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 17%
Ingenic File-Stor Gadget 256GB
42GB free, PID 0025
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.4 5.5 5.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.78% Terrible
Read 7
Write 5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.4
8% 6.28 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-062.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 48.5
82% 48.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback