Lenovo 20AN00BYUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20AN00BYUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AN00BYUK
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190227
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '19 at 00:24
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 96.3
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 124
62% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 196
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.69
Parallax 6.38
3% 5.66 fps
MRender 7.52
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 0.13
2% 3.34 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 256GB-$152
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 193 184 100 183 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 325
Write 327
Mixed 255
SusWrite 186
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 27.7
92% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 226
192% 278 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9E2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback