Asus GL552JX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus GL552JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552JX
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150309
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '19 at 02:46
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 77
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 112
59% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 115
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 1A8D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1967
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 16.6
13% 16.1 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 15.8
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
481GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 53 48 54 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 79
Write 74.4
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 53.7
43% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 57%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB
252GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 36 36 36 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 37
Write 35.7
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 36.4
44% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 0112 78.C2GCZ.9K30C 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552JX Builds (Compare 631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback