Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel To be filled by O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150204
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '19 at 17:02
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 620 9,076 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 63.3 1-Core 47 2-Core 77.5 40% 62.6 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 135 18% 134 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 0046) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.74 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S400 120GB 1,721 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0607A SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 213 212 213 216 216 MB/s Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.6% Above average	Read 229 Write 218 Mixed 219 SusWrite 214 50% 220 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 36.7 109% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 38.6 DQ Write 86.8 DQ Mixed 51.1 42% 58.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 97%
7 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 31GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 4.6 7.1 7 6 5.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	5.7% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 4 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 6 9% 8.52 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.7% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.8% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 10.2 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.2 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	109x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	43x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	38x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	95x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	55x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	9x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	257x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	92x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369