Asus Rampage II Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage II Extreme  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 10:29
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 142
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 353
39% 310 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Nvidia(10DE 1B83) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.2% Good
Lighting 76.8
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 66.3
63% 73.2 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 72
58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 170 161 161 158 159 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.8% Above average
Read 225
Write 219
Mixed 210
SusWrite 167
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 30.9
102% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 50.4
DQ Mixed 36
29% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST33000650NS 3TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 97 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 142
Write 131
Mixed 65
SusWrite 96
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 87%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 90 97 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 97.5
Mixed 59
SusWrite 96
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 58%
WDC WD32 00AAJS-56M0A0 320GB
253GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 32
Write 27
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 24.2
37% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 21%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
30GB free, PID 007a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 9.6 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 7.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 9.3
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 18GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 15.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 12
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage II Extreme Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Rampage II Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback