Intel powered classmate PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel powered classmate PC  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 07:21
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 23.9
2-Core 29.9
31% 40.5 Pts
4-Core 38.1
8-Core 43.8
5% 40.9 Pts
64-Core 47.9
3% 47.9 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 9997) 747MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.36% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.4 fps
MRender 0.76
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.59 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.36%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST250LM0 ST250LM004 HN-M2 250GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 49 42 26 20 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 62.5
Write 68.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 33.5
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical powered classmate PC Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel powered classmate PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback