Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 16 '19 at 23:58
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 78.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 237
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 837
78% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,199
74% 1,199 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37AC) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte 2080ti G1 Gaming 11gb
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3700 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 211
Parallax 244
147% 212 fps
MRender 263
Gravity 240
Splatting 145
169% 216 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 144%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
597GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 185 180 184 187 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 338
Write 323
Mixed 312
SusWrite 184
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 38.1
125% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 198
151% 206 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 125%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
2.5TB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 446 433 462 472 473 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 454
Mixed 409
SusWrite 451
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 39.6
135% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
WD Green 240GB (2016)
187GB free
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 227 130 138 139 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 454
Write 406
Mixed 372
SusWrite 191
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 20.3
96% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 33.6
89% 185 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 70%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
956GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 190 187 190 194 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
78% Very good
Read 361
Write 344
Mixed 333
SusWrite 189
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 42.1
135% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 221
165% 220 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 78%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 32.6
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 25.8
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback