Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '19 at 15:45
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2030-$24
Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G2030 @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 91.9
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 165
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 161
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 20.1
17% 19.1 fps
MRender 19
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 21.8
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 55 57 30 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.3% Average
Read 241
Write 228
Mixed 184
SusWrite 71.1
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 26.9
102% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 27.9
DQ Write 61.2
DQ Mixed 30.9
27% 40 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMS4GB364E081139PP 04CB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2 Builds (Compare 1,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback