Acer Aspire F5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire F5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Captain_SK
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 16 '19 at 03:21
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 160
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 201
29% 213 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Acer(1025 108F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1735
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 15.5
15% 15.6 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 13
13% 16.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 33 54 17 65 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.6% Average
Read 150
Write 92.8
Mixed 161
SusWrite 44.5
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 21.7
83% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 98.2
87% 131 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 85%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
703GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 40.5
Write 38.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 39.1
46% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.6% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire F5-573G Builds (Compare 1,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback