MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 19:39
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 254
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 704
75% 600 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.4% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 107
Parallax 90.6
79% 98 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 95.3
78% 94.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 632 326 327 327 325 326 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,517
Write 1,326
Mixed 536
SusWrite 377
208% 939 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 60.2
226% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1115
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 686
632% 970 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 202%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
104GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 475 475 480 482 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 482
Mixed 385
SusWrite 478
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 66.8
228% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 136%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
624GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 95 101 99 102 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 107
Write 106
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 99
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 84%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 0902
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 21 21 21 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
8.29% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 21.2
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 19.3
24% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.29%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 23.9
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback