Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 14:55
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 96.9
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 171
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 343
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Gainward(10B0 0801) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 10.1
12% 12.2 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 17.2
11% 12.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
800GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 403 402 404 407 407 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 439
Mixed 412
SusWrite 402
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 40.6
128% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 304
245% 346 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
101GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 417 421 421 422 421 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 438
Mixed 315
SusWrite 418
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 33.7
117% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 155
167% 279 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 110%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
134GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 68 67 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43% Average
Read 82.2
Write 47.4
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 67.4
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
472GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 83 83 82 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 125
Write 82.3
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 82
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 125
Write 114
Mixed 48
SusWrite 125
136% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 55%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
680GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
43% Average
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 39
SusWrite 93
120% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 8GB
1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.1% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 22.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 50.7
79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback