Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140716
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '19 at 16:12
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 261
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 524
67% 506 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 119
Parallax 98.1
89% 109 fps
MRender 97.1
Gravity 104
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 234 104 107 109 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 387
Mixed 338
SusWrite 176
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 39
152% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 248
217% 323 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
189GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 380 454 446 445 447 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 453
Mixed 393
SusWrite 433
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 68
208% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 363
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Samsung HD102UJ 1TB
236GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 89.5
Write 43.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 63.9
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 65%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78
1GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 145
Write 126
Mixed 90
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78
1GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 169
Write 151
Mixed 79.7
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1632 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 20.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 21.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $638
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback