Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$12 11,349 User benchmarks, average bench 37% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Memory 76.1 1-Core 26.5 2-Core 52.9 37% 51.8 Pts	4-Core 53.2 8-Core 51.6 7% 52.4 Pts	64-Core 52.1 3% 52.1 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400 10,400 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 6000) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 1.96 Parallax 1.66 1% 1.66 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.49 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 38 41 49 54 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 54.7 Write 56.7 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 39.1 35% 47.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 206GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 116 118 118 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 111 Write 47.9 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 116 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.3 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	91x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	34x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	13x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	12x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $619