Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
CPU throttled at 36% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E5C-A0CIN
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131101
Uptime15.7 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 10:13
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2328M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 102
53% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 148
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 1.93
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.34
2% 2.12 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.74
2% 2.52 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 69 72 64 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 65.7
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 65.7
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 50%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
392GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 24 25 25 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 22.9
Mixed 23
SusWrite 25.2
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CH9 M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,059 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback