Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '19 at 08:43
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T-$254 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 56% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 86 1-Core 39.1 2-Core 79 46% 68 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 236 24% 197 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.77% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.22 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 2 2% 1.82 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.77% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 126 125 126 127 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 394 Write 382 Mixed 286 SusWrite 126 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 62.4 4K Mixed 42.6 132% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 40.3 DQ Write 99.5 DQ Mixed 56 47% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 133%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 6GB free Firmware: 2CV102M3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 24 23 24 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 93.3 Write 54.3 Mixed 51 SusWrite 23.6 12% 55.6 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 6.4 46% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 21.7 DQ Write 27.8 DQ Mixed 10.2 12% 19.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 362GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 127 126 127 127 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 87.2 Write 97.9 Mixed 54.9 SusWrite 127 67% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.3 217% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.3% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 12.6 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 10.7 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 - $178

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	34x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	32x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	32x

GPU
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples	15x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	8x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	44x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	27x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $446

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16