Asrock X99M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 07:00
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 800
80% 651 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 117
Parallax 109
93% 113 fps
MRender 98.8
Gravity 102
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1489 398 399 400 401 401 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,613
Write 2,255
Mixed 1,597
SusWrite 581
392% 1,762 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 97.3
335% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,013
DQ Write 1,094
DQ Mixed 1,141
834% 1,083 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 291%
Great: 280%
Intenso Sata III 240GB
186GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 329 291 290 290 289 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 415
Mixed 372
SusWrite 318
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 47.7
160% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 98.2
137% 251 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
140GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 104 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 117
Write 109
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 104
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 88%
Intenso Mobile Line 16GB
10GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Read 17
Write 5.3
Mixed 12
SusWrite 4.9
12% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6MFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback