Asus Z87-WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z87-WS  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131004
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 12 '19 at 23:42
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3-$245
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 532
58% 457 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 114
Parallax 95.7
83% 104 fps
MRender 90.4
Gravity 97.2
Splatting 102
80% 96.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 243 237 249 244 234 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 408
Mixed 346
SusWrite 240
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 55
194% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 312
240% 328 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
112GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 244 243 250 244 255 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 444
Mixed 358
SusWrite 245
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 47.4
174% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
38GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 243 242 250 244 255 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 448
Mixed 321
SusWrite 245
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 44.8
170% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 153
168% 282 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
71GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 243 242 250 243 255 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 444
Mixed 428
SusWrite 244
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 57.9
200% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 347
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 113%
Great: 131%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
42GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 243 242 250 244 255 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 437
Mixed 376
SusWrite 245
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 59.7
208% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 327
253% 346 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1333EL Series 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-WS Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Z87-WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $641
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback