Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateApr 12 '19 at 08:39
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 208
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 388
51% 385 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.2% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 43.2
Parallax 38.6
28% 38.9 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 25.9
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 36 45 48 42 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 93.4
Write 88.8
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 42.5
55% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
2GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 10 18 17 15 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 6.8
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 14.4
21% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.3
160% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 31%
Multiple Flash Reader 64GB
34GB free, PID 6361
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 18 18 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 17.8
Write 17.3
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 17.4
24% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.3
225% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback