HP 850-055qe

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 850-055qe  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B36
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '16 at 17:32
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 230
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 626
63% 512 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
HP(103C 2B49) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.6% Above average
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 79.8
Parallax 70.7
62% 75.4 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 63.1
56% 68.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB2Q-512G-1006 512GB
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 396
Write 352
Mixed 364
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 16.6
104% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 16.3
25% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
921GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 172
Mixed 160
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.34
4K Write 2.79
4K Mixed 0.34
145% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 850-055qe Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP 850-055qe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback