Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 02 '16 at 14:54
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 51.1
2-Core 103
52% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 306
32% 256 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 55.4
38% 47.9 fps
MRender 57.2
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 40.4
40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 476
Write 177
Mixed 184
61% 279 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 11.2
66% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 56.9
DQ Mixed 11.4
40% 91.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
204GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 69.5
Mixed 62.9
50% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.36
92% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
73GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 67.8
Mixed 61.6
49% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.34
96% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBXL F3-12800CL9-2GBXL F3-12800CL9-2GBXL F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11.6
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.4
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback