Apple iMac18,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple iMac18,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-77F17D7DA9285301
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2304 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '19 at 17:09
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 410
55% 409 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 560
Apple(106B 016A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 907 MHz, MLim: 1280 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 29.7
20% 25.8 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 24.7
19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SAMSUNG HM501II 500GB
258GB free (System drive), PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 28 21 18 21 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 24.9
Write 27.6
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 22.5
32% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x2020202020202020202020202020202020202020 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 28.4
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 25.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,2 Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac18,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback