MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 09 '19 at 16:25
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 807
79% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1416 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.6% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 79.2
50% 71 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 57.3
49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 861 96 138 109 103 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,453
Write 1,556
Mixed 1,080
SusWrite 235
242% 1081 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 71.5
244% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 270
338% 589 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 182%
Great: 255%
Transcend SSD370 64GB-$39
25GB free
Firmware: N1114H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 76 76 75 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65% Good
Read 427
Write 75.5
Mixed 124
SusWrite 75.4
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 33.2
124% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 75.2
DQ Mixed 87.3
72% 105 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65%
Great: 66%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
111GB free
Firmware: 0C3K87RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 66 60 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 486
Write 355
Mixed 153
SusWrite 86.3
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 40
133% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 110
104% 168 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 181 182 184 184 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 154
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 183
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 192 194 193 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 190
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 191
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $707
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback