Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '19 at 19:19
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 95
1-Core 121
2-Core 255
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 652
70% 555 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 122
Parallax 103
89% 111 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 100
Splatting 105
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 391 398 409 410 412 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 492
Mixed 416
SusWrite 402
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 74.7
262% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 142%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
227GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 393 398 409 409 404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 487
Mixed 410
SusWrite 401
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 73
255% 95.3 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 140%
Great: 134%
WD WD3200AAJB-00J3A0 320GB
282GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 88 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 77
Write 89.3
Mixed 49
SusWrite 90.2
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 46%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
779GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 140 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 169
Write 136
Mixed 104
SusWrite 140
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 108%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
439GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 172 170 173 173 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 172
Mixed 101
SusWrite 172
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.7% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 20.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 3,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback