Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Dell OptiPlex 7010
Motherboard	Dell OptiPlex 7010 (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130610
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '19 at 17:34
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 88.7 2-Core 165 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 331 44% 328 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% PNY(196E 104A) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.83% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 1.81 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 1.83 2% 2.16 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.83% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10365 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 96 75 60 80 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 246 Write 162 Mixed 162 SusWrite 88.3 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 29.2 4K Mixed 18.8 66% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 65.6 DQ Mixed 62.2 52% 76.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 51%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41 8,190 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 379GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 102 104 98 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 108 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 102 67% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 58%
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 32GB 1,354 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 29GB free, PID 16a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 20 21 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 110 Write 28.2 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 18.1 39% 40.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 39% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 5,657 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.8 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 15.1 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	3,924x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	3,543x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	1,609x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,190x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	984x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	933x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	466x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	184x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	180x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	226x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	158x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	152x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16