MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A37
MotherboardMSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170324
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateApr 08 '19 at 10:27
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 231
73% 136 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 694
63% 529 Pts
64-Core 1,126
70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6684) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 144
Parallax 135
115% 140 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 137
Splatting 108
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 334 333 230 242 232 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 415
Write 406
Mixed 276
SusWrite 287
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 33.7
115% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 251
203% 287 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 99%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
132GB free
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 92 99 76 92 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 436
Write 364
Mixed 278
SusWrite 104
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 16.9
70% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 83.5
DQ Mixed 40.3
46% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 55%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
361GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 419 317 247 248 248 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 400
Write 471
Mixed 379
SusWrite 317
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 34.1
122% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 320
243% 327 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 99%
SAMSUNG HD400LD 400GB
212GB free, PID cb07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.3% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 30.7
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 14.1
34% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 15%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 126GB
117GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.5 8.6 8.1 9.3 7.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
6.49% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 6.8
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 8
15% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.8
50% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.49%
Great: 21%
FV-U35 320GB
247GB free, PID ce12
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 15 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.9% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 35.3
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 15.9
38% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4 Kingston KHX2400C CMK32GX4 Kingston KHX2400C 64GB
1067, 1200, 1067, 1200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 20
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37) Builds (Compare 736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $311
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback