PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 870 Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100914 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 08 '19 at 03:46 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 390X-$340
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
CHN-25SATAA3-240 240GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 65 76 128 126 120 MB/s
|
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
440GB free
Firmware: 1AA01117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 102 102 103 MB/s
|
59.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
30.7%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 15x |
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 8x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples | 4x |
Radeon HD 7350AMDBench 1%, 193 samples | 3x |
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $111 |