HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory4.3 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120926
Uptime24.9 Days
Run DateApr 08 '19 at 02:47
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 92.4
52% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 81.8
8-Core 87.6
11% 84.7 Pts
64-Core 88.8
6% 88.8 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
HP(103C 1850) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1007
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 2.25
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 4
3% 3.26 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 81 54 59 58 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 411
Write 285
Mixed 135
SusWrite 80.8
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 37.2
128% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 113
92% 131 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
U P H H H H H H 7GB
800, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.9% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback